Educational performance in Mexico: The Enlace test

  • Raymundo M. Campos Vazquez El Colegio de México, A.C.
  • Freddy D. Urbina Romero Coneval
Keywords: Mexico, education, standardized tests, teachers
JEL Classification: H40, I20, I21, O10, O54

Abstract

This article measures the relationship between a standardized test applied at the national level (Enlace) with bimonthly test results at the classroom level. The results for mathematics imply that a one standard deviation increase in cumulative learning measured with the bimonthly tests increase the Enlace tests scores by 0.84 standard deviations. The result is robust to different estimation methods like quantile regression, fixed effects at the school level and mixed models. Therefore, we conclude that what it is taught in the classroom is reflected in the Enlace test.

References

Abreu, R. y D. C. Martín del Campo. 2007. Índice compuesto de eficacia de los sistemas escolares, 2007, Mexicanos Primero Visión 2030, A.C./Fundación IDEA, A.C.

Andrabi, T., J. Das, A. I. Khwaja y T. Zajonc. 2009. Do Value-Added Estimates Add Value? Accounting for Learning Dynamics, The World Bank, Development Research Group, Policy Research Working Paper, núm. 5066.

Cameron, A. C. y P. K. Trivedi. 2005. Microeconometrics. Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press.

De Hoyos, R., J. M. Espino y V. García. 2010. Determinantes del logro escolar en México: primeros resultados utilizado la prueba Enlace media superior, Subsecretaría de Educación Media Superior, México (inédito).

Figlio, D. N. 2006. Testing, Crime and Punishment, Journal of Public Economics, 90(4-5): 837-851.

Figlio, D. N. y L. S. Getzler. 2002. Accountability, Ability and Disability: Gaming the System, NBER Working Paper Series, núm. 9307.

Glewwe, P., N. Ilias y M. Kremer. 2010. Teacher Incentives, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(3): 205-227.

Jacob, B. A. 2005. Accountability, Incentives and Behavior: The Impact of HighStakes Testing in the Chicago Public Schools, Journal of Public Economics, 89(5-6): 761-796.

Jacob, B. A., L. J. Lefgren y D. Sims. 2008. The persistence of Teacher-Induced Learning Gains, NBER Working Paper Series, núm. 14065.

Kane, T. J., D. Grissmer, D. O. Staiger y H. F. Ladd. 2002. Volatility in School Test Scores: Implications for Test-Based Accountability Systems, Brookings Papers on Education Policy, núm. 5, The Brookings Institution, pp. 235-283.

Kane, T. J. y D. O. Staiger. 2001. Improving School Accountability Measures, NBER Working Paper Series, núm. 8156.

Kane, T. J. y D. O. Staiger. 2002. The Promise and Pitfalls of Using Imprecise School Accountability Measures, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(4): 91-114.

Kane, T. J. y D. O. Staiger. 2008. Estimating Teacher Impacts on Student Achievement: An experimental Evaluation, NBER Working Paper Series, núm. 14607.

Kolen, M. J. 1988. Defining Score Scales in Relation to Measurement Error, Journal of Educational Measurement, 25(2): 97-110.

Koretz, D. M. 2002. Limitations in the Use of Achievement Tests as Measures of Educators’ Productivity, Journal of Human Resources, 37(4): 752-777.

McCaffrey, D. F., J.R. Lockwood, D. Koretz, T. A. Louis, y L. Hamilton. 2004. Models for Value Added Modeling of Teacher Effects, Journal of Educational an Behavioral Statistics, Valued-Added Assessment Special Isuue, 29(1): 67- 101.

Mizala, A., P. Romaguera y M. Urquiola. 2007. Socioeconomic Status or Noise? Tradeoffs in the generation of school quality information, Journal of Development Economics, 84(1): 61-75.

Neal, D. y D. W. Schanzenbach. 2007. Left Behind by Design: Proficiency Counts and Test-Based Accountability, NBER Working Paper Series, núm. 13293.

Raudenbush, S. W. 2004. What Are Value-Added Models Estimating and What Does This Imply for Statistical Practice? Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Value-Added Assessment Special Issue, 29(1): 121-129.

Rothstein, J. 2010. Teacher Quality in Educational Production: Tracking, Decay, and Student Achievement, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1): 175-214.

Rubin, D. B., E. A. Stuart y E. L. Zanutto. 2004. A Potential Outcomes View of Value-Added Assessment in Education, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Value-Added Assessment Special Issue, 29(1): 103-116.

SEP. 2011. Evaluación nacional del logro académico en centros escolares, enlace, en: http://enlace.sep.gob.mx/.

Shepard, L. A. 1990. Inflated Test Score Gains: Is the Problem Old Norms or Teaching the Test? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(3): 15-22.

Todd, P. y K. I. Wolpin. 2003. On the Specification and Estimation of the Production Function for Cognitive Achievement, The Economic Journal, 113(485): F3-F33.

Woodhouse, G., M. Yang, H. Goldstein y J. Rasbash. 1996. Adjusting for Measurement Error in Multilevel Analysis, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 159(2): 201-212.

Published
01-07-2011
How to Cite
Campos VazquezR., & Urbina RomeroF. (2011). Educational performance in Mexico: The Enlace test. Estudios Económicos, 26(2), 249-292. https://doi.org/10.24201/ee.v26i2.98
  • Abstract viewed - 840 times
  • PDF (Spanish) downloaded: 270 times