
Published 2025-03-26
Keywords
- discrete choice,
- care work,
- microsimulations,
- childcare
How to Cite
Abstract
This paper develops a discrete choice model to analyze the labor and childcare decisions of Mexican women with children under five years of age. A mixed logit model is used to simulate the potential effects of public policies on these decisions. Data from the National Survey on Time Use shows that disposable income, leisure, and the number of childcare options can explain women's labor and care decisions. In addition, it shows that the presence of children under two years old in the home decreases a woman's probability of entering the labor market. Alternatively, the presence of children between three and five years old or grandparents who are able to provide care increases it. Policy simulations suggest that the most effective policy to increase women's participation in the labor market is a reduction of the marginal rate of the personal income tax for women working in the formal sector who have children under five years old, compared to other options such as tax credits and conditional cash transfers for women in the formal sector. The simulated policies have limitations since the poorest women are employed in the informal sector.
Downloads
References
- Absalón, C. and C. Urzúa. 2012. Distributive effects of the 2010 tax reform in Mexico: A microsimulation analysis, in C. Urzúa (ed.), Fiscal Inclusive Development: Microsimulation Models for Latin America, Mexico City, Tecnológico de Monterrey.
- Addati, L., U. Cattaneo, V. Esquivel, and I. Valarino. 2019. Care Work and Care Jobs for the Future of Decent Work, Geneva, International Labour Organization.
- Arceo-Gómez, E. and R. Campos-Vázquez. 2010. Labor supply of married women in Mexico: 1990-2000, Working Paper No. XVI-2010, Centro de Estudios Económicos.
- Averet, S., E. Peters, and D. Waldman. 1997. Tax credits, labor supply, and childcare, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(1): 125-135.
- Calderon, G. 2014. The effects of childcare provision in Mexico, Technical Report No, 2014-07, Banco de México.
- Cameron, C. and P. Trivedi. 2005. Microeconometrics Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press.
- Conelly, R. 1992. The effect of childcare costs on married women’s labour force participation, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(1): 83–90.
- CONEVAL. 2021. Líneas de pobreza por ingresos, https://www.coneval.org.mx/Medicion/MP/Paginas/Lineas-de-bienestar-y-canastabasica.aspx
- CONEVAL. 2023. Medición de la pobreza. Programas de cálculo 2016, 2018, 2020, 2022. https://www.coneval.org.mx/Medicion/MP/Paginas/ProgramasBD2022.aspx
- Dávila, L. 2016. How does Prospera work? Best practices in the implementation of conditional cash transfer programs in Latin America and the Caribbean, Technical Note No. IDB-TN-971, Inter-American Development Bank.
- Del Boca, D. 2015. Childcare arrangements and labor supply, Working Paper Series No. IDB-WP-569, Inter-American Development Bank.
- ECLAC and ILO. 2019. Evolución y perspectivas de la participación laboral femenina en América Latina, Coyuntura Laboral en América Latina y el Caribe No. 21, United Nations.
- Gong, X. and A. van Soest. 2002. Family structure and female labor supply in Mexico City, The Journal of Human Resources, 37(1): 163-191.
- Grosh, M. and J. Baker. 1995. Proxy means tests for targeting social programs: Simulations and speculation, Working Paper No. LSM 118, The World Bank.
- Hoehn-Velasco, L., A. Silverio-Murillo, J. Balmori de la Miyar, and J. Penglase. 2022. The impact of the COVID-19 recession on Mexican households: Evidence from employment and time use for men, women, and children, Review of Economic of the Household, 20(3): 763-797.
- INEGI. 2021a. Trabajo no remunerado de los hogares, https://www.inegi.org.mx/temas/tnrh/
- INEGI. 2021b. Encuesta nacional de ocupación y empleo, https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/enoe/15ymas
- INEGI. 2021c. Encuesta nacional de ocupación y empleo: microdatos, https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/enoe/15ymas/#microdatos
- INEGI. 2023. Encuesta nacional de empleo y seguridad social, https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/eness/2017/microdatos
- ILO. 2016. Women at Work: Trends 2016, Geneva, International Labour Office.
- Kalb, G. and T. Thoresen. 2010. A comparison of family policy designs of Australia and Norway using microsimulation models, Review of Economics of the Household, 8: 255–287.
- Kornstad, T. and T. Thoresen. 2007. A discrete choice model for labor surplus and child care, Journal of Population Economics, 20(4): 781-803.
- López-Rodríguez, P. and M. Orozco. 2019. Mercado laboral femenino y capital social, necesidades de cuidados e inclusión financiera, Revista de Coyuntura y Perspectiva, 4(4): 79-129.
- Marschak, J. 1960. Binary-choice constraints and random utility indicators, Economic Information, Decision, and Prediction, 7(1): 218-239.
- McFadden, D. 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior, in P. Zarembka (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, New York, Academic Press.
- Morrisey, T. 2017. Child care and parent labor force participation: A review of the research literature, Review of Economics of the Household, 15(1): 1-24.
- Nieves, M. and C. Robles. 2016. Políticas de cuidado en América Latina: forjando la igualdad, Technical Report No. 140, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.
- UN Women and ECLAC. 2020. Cuidados en América Latina y el Caribe en tiempos de COVID-19. Hacia sistemas integrales para fortalecer la respuesta y la recuperación, https://lac.unwomen.org/es/digiteca/publicaciones/2020/08/cuidados-en-america-latina-y-el-caribe-en-tiempos-de-covid-19#view
- Orozco, M., J. Franco, M. Marchant, and R. Valdivia. 2022a. The role of care and the local economy in women’s labour force participation: Evidence from Mexico and Colombia in the pandemic era, Gender and Development, 30(1): 145-175.
- Orozco Corona, M., R. Espinosa, C. Fonseca, M. Marchant, and R. Velez Grajales. 2022b. Movilidad social, políticas de cuidados y protección social, Documento de Trabajo No. 01/2022, Centro de Estudios Espinosa Yglesias.
- Pacheco, E. 2018. El trabajo del cuidado desde la perspectiva de usos del tiempo, in M. Ferreyra, T. Guerra, A. Cházaro (eds.), El Trabajo de Cuidados: Una Cuestión de Derechos Humanos y Políticas Públicas, UN Women.
- Talamas, M. 2023. Grandmothers and the gender gap in the Mexican labor market, Journal of Development Economics, 162: 103013.
- Train, K. 2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press.