On the variety of Mexico’s export goods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24201/ee.v30i2.26Keywords:
NAFTA, export goods varietyAbstract
This paper examines the evolution of the variety of Mexico’s export goods using disaggregated trade data. Both the econometric estimation analyses using the raw data and the one using an improved version of Feenstra and Kee’s (2004, 2007) methodology proposed in this paper show that NAFTA membership does not enhance the variety of Mexico’s export goods. This finding contrasts with NAFTA’s positive association with the increase in export variety found in the literature
Metrics
References
Amiti, M. and J. Konings. 2007. Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: Evidence from Indonesia, American Economic Review, 97(5): 1611-1638.
Baier, S. L., J. H. Bergstran, and M. Feng. 2011. Economic integration agreements and the margins of international trade, University of Notre Dame, WP,
www3.nd.edu/jbergstr/WorkingPapers/Baier%20Bergstrand%20Feng%20Margins%20and%20EIAs.pdf>.
Baldwin, R. 2010. Unilateral tariff liberalization, NBER Working Paper Series, no. 16600.
Baldwin, R. and, J. Harrigan. 2011. Zeros, quality and space: Trade theory and trade evidence, American Economic Journal, 3(2): 60-88.
Breitung, J. 2000. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data, in B. H. Baltagi (ed.), Advances in Econometrics, vol. 15, Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels Amsterdam, JAI Press, pp. 161-178.
Broda, C., and D. Weinstein. 2006. Globalization and the gains from variety, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2): 541-585.
Cadot, O., C. Carrére C., and V. Strauss-Kahn. 2007. Export diversification: What’s behind the Hump?, CEPR Discussion Paper, no. 6590.
Feenstra, R. 1994. New product varieties and the measurement of international prices, American Economic Review, 84(1): 157-177.
Feenstra, R. and H. Kee. 2004. On the measurement of product variety in trade, American Economic Review, 94(2): 145-149.
Feenstra, R. and H. Kee. 2007. Trade liberalisation and export variety: A comparison of Mexico and China, World Economy, 1(1): 5-21.
Hanson, G. 2010. Why isn’t Mexico rich? NBER Working Paper Series, no. 16470.
Hadri, K. 2000, Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data, Econometrics Journal, 3: 148-161.
Harris, R., and E. Tzavalis. 1999. Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed, Journal of Econometrics, 91: 201-226.
Helpman, E. Melitz, and Y. Rubinstein. 2008. Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2): 441- 487.
Hummels, D., and P. Klenow. 2005. The variety and quality of a nation’s exports, American Economic Review, 704-723.
Imbs, J. and R. Wacziarg. 2003. Stages of diversification, American Economic Review, 9(1): 63-86.
Im, K., M. Pesaran, and Y. Shin. 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels, Journal of Econometrics, 115: 53-74.
Kehoe, T., and K. Ruhl. 2009. How important is the new goods margin in international trade? Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Staff Report no. 324.
Klinger, B. and D. Lederman. 2004. Discovery and development: An empirical exploration of ’new’ products,World Bank Policy Research, Working Paper Series, no. 3450.
Krugman, P. 1980. Scale economies, product differentiation and the pattern of trade, American Economic Review, 70: 950-959.
Lederman, D., W. Maloney, and L. Serven L. 2004. Lessons from NAFTA, World Bank.
Levin, A., C. Lin, and C. Chu. 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties, Journal of Econometrics, 108: 1-24.
Melitz, M. 2003. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggre gate industry productivity, Econometrica, 71(6): 1695-1725.
Quah, D. 1994. Exploiting cross-section variation for unit root inference in dynamic data, Economics Letters, 44: 9-19.
Sachs, J., and A. Warner. 1995. Economic reform and the process of global integration, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, pp. 1-118.
United Nations (UN). 2004. Central Product Classification (CPC): Version 1.1, Statistical Division, Statistical Papers, Series M, no. 77.
Zwinkels, R., and S. Beugelsdijk. 2010. Gravity equations: Workhorse or Trojan horse in explaining trade and FDI patterns across time and space?, International Business Review, 19: 102-115.
Language
Search
Social Networks
Newsletter
Statistics
View 
Biblat Indicators 
Matomo
