60-vol. 30 núm. 2, julio-diciembre, 2015
Artículos

Sobre la variedad de productos de exportación de México

pdf

PDF (English)
pdf

XML (English)
  • Tadashi Ito
Tadashi Ito
Institute of Developing Economies, Japan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24201/ee.v30i2.26

Publicado 2015-07-01

Palabras clave

  • Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte,
  • variedad de las exportaciones de bienes,
  • México

Cómo citar

Ito, T. (2015). Sobre la variedad de productos de exportación de México. Estudios Económicos De El Colegio De México, 30(2), 183–218. https://doi.org/10.24201/ee.v30i2.26

Métrica

Resumen

Se examina la evolución de la variedad de las exportaciones de bienes de México con datos desagregados de comercio. Tanto los resultados de las estimaciones basadas en los datos sin procesar, como aquellos obtenidos con base en datos procesados de acuerdo con la versión mejorada de la metodología de Feenstra y Kee (2004, 2007), que se propone en este artículo, indican que el Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte (TLCAN) no ha provocado un aumento de la variedad de los productos exportados por México. Este resultado contrasta con la asociación positiva entre el TLCAN y la variedad exportadora encontrada en trabajos previos.

pdf

PDF (English)
pdf

XML (English)

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

  1. Amiti, M. and J. Konings. 2007. Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: Evidence from Indonesia, American Economic Review, 97(5): 1611-1638.
  2. Baier, S. L., J. H. Bergstran, and M. Feng. 2011. Economic integration agreements and the margins of international trade, University of Notre Dame, WP,
  3. www3.nd.edu/jbergstr/WorkingPapers/Baier%20Bergstrand%20Feng%20Margins%20and%20EIAs.pdf>.
  4. Baldwin, R. 2010. Unilateral tariff liberalization, NBER Working Paper Series, no. 16600.
  5. Baldwin, R. and, J. Harrigan. 2011. Zeros, quality and space: Trade theory and trade evidence, American Economic Journal, 3(2): 60-88.
  6. Breitung, J. 2000. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data, in B. H. Baltagi (ed.), Advances in Econometrics, vol. 15, Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels Amsterdam, JAI Press, pp. 161-178.
  7. Broda, C., and D. Weinstein. 2006. Globalization and the gains from variety, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2): 541-585.
  8. Cadot, O., C. Carrére C., and V. Strauss-Kahn. 2007. Export diversification: What’s behind the Hump?, CEPR Discussion Paper, no. 6590.
  9. Feenstra, R. 1994. New product varieties and the measurement of international prices, American Economic Review, 84(1): 157-177.
  10. Feenstra, R. and H. Kee. 2004. On the measurement of product variety in trade, American Economic Review, 94(2): 145-149.
  11. Feenstra, R. and H. Kee. 2007. Trade liberalisation and export variety: A comparison of Mexico and China, World Economy, 1(1): 5-21.
  12. Hanson, G. 2010. Why isn’t Mexico rich? NBER Working Paper Series, no. 16470.
  13. Hadri, K. 2000, Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data, Econometrics Journal, 3: 148-161.
  14. Harris, R., and E. Tzavalis. 1999. Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed, Journal of Econometrics, 91: 201-226.
  15. Helpman, E. Melitz, and Y. Rubinstein. 2008. Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2): 441- 487.
  16. Hummels, D., and P. Klenow. 2005. The variety and quality of a nation’s exports, American Economic Review, 704-723.
  17. Imbs, J. and R. Wacziarg. 2003. Stages of diversification, American Economic Review, 9(1): 63-86.
  18. Im, K., M. Pesaran, and Y. Shin. 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels, Journal of Econometrics, 115: 53-74.
  19. Kehoe, T., and K. Ruhl. 2009. How important is the new goods margin in international trade? Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Staff Report no. 324.
  20. Klinger, B. and D. Lederman. 2004. Discovery and development: An empirical exploration of ’new’ products,World Bank Policy Research, Working Paper Series, no. 3450.
  21. Krugman, P. 1980. Scale economies, product differentiation and the pattern of trade, American Economic Review, 70: 950-959.
  22. Lederman, D., W. Maloney, and L. Serven L. 2004. Lessons from NAFTA, World Bank.
  23. Levin, A., C. Lin, and C. Chu. 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties, Journal of Econometrics, 108: 1-24.
  24. Melitz, M. 2003. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggre gate industry productivity, Econometrica, 71(6): 1695-1725.
  25. Quah, D. 1994. Exploiting cross-section variation for unit root inference in dynamic data, Economics Letters, 44: 9-19.
  26. Sachs, J., and A. Warner. 1995. Economic reform and the process of global integration, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, pp. 1-118.
  27. United Nations (UN). 2004. Central Product Classification (CPC): Version 1.1, Statistical Division, Statistical Papers, Series M, no. 77.
  28. Zwinkels, R., and S. Beugelsdijk. 2010. Gravity equations: Workhorse or Trojan horse in explaining trade and FDI patterns across time and space?, International Business Review, 19: 102-115.