Compliance in contributions payment: Fiscal authorities versus religious authorities in Mexico

  • Luis Augusto Chávez Maza CEDES / Benemérita Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Puebla
  • Alexander Elbittar Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas
  • Fausto Hernández Trillo Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas y Kellogg Institute for International Studies
JEL Classification: H20, H31, H44

Abstract

This paper studies fiscal correspondence and fiscal trust. Through an experimental design carried out in Oaxaca, Mexico it explores which authority, the religious or the civil one, is better at collecting contributions to finance common goods. Results suggest that fiscal correspondence is the main factor to explain better collection. That is, when the good is observable, people are more willing to pay the contribution.

References

Allingham, M. G. y A. Sandmo. 1972. Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis, Journal of Public Economics, 1: 323-338.

Alm, J., G. H. McClelland y W. D. Schulze. 1992. Why do people pay taxes?, Journal of Public Economics, 48: 21-38.

Alm, J., B. R. Jackson y M. McKee. 1992a. Estimating the determinants of taxpayer compliance with experimental data, National Tax Journal, 45: 107- 114.

Alm, J., B. R. Jackson y M. McKee. 1992b. Institutional uncertainty and taxpayer compliance, American Economic Review, 82: 1018-1026.

Andreoni, J. 1998. Why free ride? Strategies and learning in public good experiments, Journal of Public Economics, 37: 291-304.

Banerjee, A. y E. Duflo. 2007. The economic lives of the poor, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(1): 141-168.

Bateman, I. J. e I. H. Langford. 1997. Non-users’ Willingness to pay for a National Park: An application and critique of the Contingent Valuation Method, Regional Studies, 31: 571-582.

Becker, W., H. J. Buchner y S. Sleeking. 1987. The impact of public transfer expenditures on tax evasion: an experimental approach, Journal of Public Economics, 34: 243-263.

Casar, M. A. 2013. Los mexicanos contra los impuestos, Nexos, noviembre,

De Cremer, D. y T. R. Tyler. 2007. The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation, Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 639-649.

DellAnno, R. 2009. Tax evasion, tax morale and policy maker’s effectiveness, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38: 988-997.

Feld, L. P. y B. S. Frey. 2002. Trust breeds trust: How taxpayers are treated, Economics of Governance, 3: 87-99.

Fischbacher, U., S. Gächter y E. Fehr. 2001. Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods game, Economics Letters, 71: 397-404.

Fortin, B., G. Lacroix y M. C. Villeval. 2007. Tax evasion and social interactions, Journal of Public Economics, 91: 2089-2112.

Friedland, N. 1982. A note on tax evasion as a function of the quality of information about the magnitude and creditability of threatened fines: Some preliminary research, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12: 54-59.

Fujimoto, H. y E. S. Park. 2010. Framing effects and gender differences in voluntary public goods provision experiments, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39: 455-457.

Kahneman, D. y A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47: 263-291.

Kastlunger, B, E. Lozza, E. Kirchler y A. Schabmann. 2013. Powerful authorities and trusting citizens: The Slippery Slope Framework and tax compliance in Italy, Journal of Economic Psychology, 34: 36-45.

Lubian, D. y L. Zarri. 2011. Happiness and tax morale: An empirical analysis, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 80: 223-243.

Millán, S. 1993. La ceremonia perpetua: ciclos festivos y organización ceremonial en el sur de Oaxaca, México, INA-Sedesol.

Nowell, C. y S. Tinkler. 1994. The influence of gender on the provision of a public good, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 25, 25-36.

Oates, W. 1977. Federalismo fiscal, Madrid, Instituto de Estudios de Administración Local.

Slemrod, J. y S. Yitzhaki. 2000. Tax avoidance, evasion, and administration, NBER Working Paper, núm. 7476.

Sour, L. 2004. An economic model of tax compliance with individual morality and group conformity, Economic Mexicana, 13: 43-61.

Sour, L. 2006. Cumplimiento fiscal y bienes públicos: Son realmente compatibles?, El Trimestre Económico, 292: 863-880.

Spicer, M. W. y L. A. Becker. 1980. Fiscal inequity and tax evasion: an experimental approach, National Tax Journal, 33: 442-457.

Sugden, R. 1984. Reciprocity: The supply of public goods through voluntary contributions, Economic Journal, 94: 772-787.

Torgler, B. 2003. To evade taxes or not to evade: that is the question, Journal of Socio-Economics, 32: 283-302.

Tyler, T. R. 2006. Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation, Annual Review of Psychology, 57: 375-400.

Van Dijke, M. y P. Verboon. 2010. Trust in authorities as a boundary condition to procedural fairness effects on tax compliance, Journal of Economic Psychology, 31: 80-91.

Published
01-01-2015
How to Cite
Chávez MazaL., ElbittarA., & Hernández TrilloF. (2015). Compliance in contributions payment: Fiscal authorities versus religious authorities in Mexico. Estudios Económicos, 30(1), 51-74. https://doi.org/10.24201/ee.v30i1.22
  • Abstract viewed - 326 times
  • PDF (Spanish) downloaded - 77 times
  • XML (Spanish) downloaded - 0 times