67-vol. 34, núm. 1, enero-junio, 2019
Artículos

¿Es hereditario el empleo en el sector formal? Determinantes de la elección del sector formal/informal para los trabajadores mexicanos hombres

Adelaido García-Andrés
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
Ernesto Aguayo-Téllez
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
Jose N. Martínez
California State University, Dominguez Hills

Publicado 2019-01-01

Palabras clave

  • movilidad laboral,
  • ocupacional e intergeneracional,
  • elección ocupacional,
  • diferenciales salariales,
  • mercados laborales informales

Cómo citar

García-Andrés, A., Aguayo-Téllez, E., & Martínez, J. N. (2019). ¿Es hereditario el empleo en el sector formal? Determinantes de la elección del sector formal/informal para los trabajadores mexicanos hombres. Estudios Económicos De El Colegio De México, 34(1), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.24201/ee.v34i1.365

Métrica

Resumen

Entender la relación entre el trabajo formal e informal de padres e hijos es esencial para promover la movilidad social en México. Con base en la encuesta de movilidad social 2011 (EMOVI), este artículo contribuye a estudiar la movilidad intergeneracional del empleo. Se encuentra una fuerte conexión entre las decisiones intergeneracionales de empleo y una selección positiva de los trabajadores. Individuos cuyos padres trabajaron en el sector formal tienen mayores probabilidades de trabajar en el sector formal y viceversa. Además, después de controlar por el sector de empleo, la escolaridad permanece como un vehículo importante para acceder al sector formal.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

  1. Adamchik, V., and V. Bedi. 1983. Wage differentials between the public and the private sectors: Evidence from an economy in transition, Labor Economics , 7(1): 203-224.
  2. Alcaraz, C., D. Chiquiar, and A. Salcedo. 2015. Informality and segmentation in the Mexican labor market, Working Papers, no. 2015-25, Banco de México.
  3. Barret G., and D. Doiron. 2001. Working part time: By choice or by constraint, The Canadian Journal of Economics , 34(4): 1042-1065.
  4. Blanden, J. 2013. Cross-national ranking of intergenerational mobility: A comparison of approaches from economics and sociology, Journal of Economic Surveys , 27(1): 38-73.
  5. Caamal, C. 2007. Oferta laboral en México: un enfoque de variables instrumentales, Ensayos Revista de Economía, 0(1): 115-154.
  6. Campos, R. and R. Velez. 2014. Female labour supply and intergenerational preference formation: Evidence for Mexico, Oxford Development Studies, 42(4): 553-569.
  7. Castillo, D., and F. Vela. 2013. Labor mobility and intergenerational transmission of self-employment in Mexico, Iberoamericana, 1(6): 193-235.
  8. Centro de Estudios Espinoza Iglesias (CEEY). 2011. Encuesta ESRU de movilidad social en México 2011 or ESRU Survey of Social Mobility in Mexico 2011, EMOVI 2011, Fundación ESRU, https://ceey.org.mx.
  9. Colombier, N., and D. Masclet. 2008. Intergenerational correlation in selfemployment: some further evidence from French ECHP data, Small Business Economics, 30(1): 423-437.
  10. De Paul, V., J. Massil, and K. Modeste. 2013. Intergenerational transmission of self-employed status and informal production units performance in Cameroon, MPRA Paper, no. 50133.
  11. Dickens, W., and K. Lang. 1985. A test of dual labor market theory, American Economic Review, 75(4): 729-805.
  12. Duval, R., and R. Smith. 2011. Informality and Seguro Popular under segmented labor markets, CIDE, preliminary draft. http://conference.iza.org/conferencefiles/worldb2011/3229.pdf
  13. Eichhorst, W., and M. Kendzia. 2014. Workforce segmentation in Germany: From the founding era to the present time, IZA, Discussion Paper, no. 8648.
  14. Fairlie, R., and A. Robb. 2006. Families, human capital, and small business: Evidence from the characteristics of business owner’s survey, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 60(2): 225-245.
  15. Fields, G. 1990. Labour market modeling and the urban informal sector: Theory and evidence, in D. Turnham, and A. Schwarz (eds.), The Informal Sector Revisited, Paris, Development Centre of the OECD.
  16. Fiess, N., M. Fugazza, and W. Maloney. 2010. Informal self-employment and macroeconomic fluctuations, Journal of Development Economics, 91(2): 211-226.
  17. Fox, L., F. Torche, and J. Waldfogel. 2016. Intergenerational mobility, in D. Brady, and L. Burton (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Social Science of Poverty, Oxford University Press.
  18. Harris, J., and M. Todaro. 1970. Migration, unemployment and development: A two sector analysis, American Economic Review, 60(1): 126-142.
  19. Hout, M., and H. Rosen. 2000. Self-employment, family background, and race, Journal of Human Resources, 32(4): 670-692.
  20. Huesca, L., and A. Padilla. 2012. Empleo, escolaridad y sector informal en la frontera norte de México y Chihuahua: expectativas de ocupación en la crisis, Ensayos Revista de Economía, 31(2): 57-86.
  21. ILO. 2013. Measuring informality: A statistical manual on the informal sector and informal employment, Geneva, International Labor Organization, <http://www.ilo.ch/global/publications/ilo-bookstore/order-online/books/WCMS 222979/lang–en/index.htm>.
  22. ILO. 2014. Informal employment in Mexico: Current situation, policies and challenges, FORLAC Programme.
  23. Koumenta, M. 2011. Modernization, privatization, and the public services ethos in the United Kingdom, in D. Marsen (ed.), Employment in the Lean Years. Policy and Prospects for the Next Decade, Oxford University Press.
  24. Leal-Ordoñez, J. 2014. Tax collection, the informal sector, and productivity, Review of Economic Dynamics, 17(1): 262-286.
  25. Lee, L. 1978. Unionism and wage rates: A simultaneous equations model with qualitative and limited dependent variables, International Economic Review, 19(1): 415-433.
  26. Lee, L. 1982. Some approaches to the correction of selectivity bias, Review of Economic Studies, 49(3): 355-372.
  27. Lewis, W. 1954. Economic development with unlimited supply of labor, Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, 22(1): 139-191.
  28. Maddala, G. 1983. Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Economics, New York, Cambridge University Press.
  29. Magnac, T. 1991. Segmented or competitive labor markets, Econometrica, 59(1): 165-187.
  30. Maloney, W. 2004. Informality revisited, World Development, 32(7): 1159-1178.
  31. Maloney, W., and E. Ribeiro. 1999. Efficiency wage and union effects in labor demand and wage structure in Mexico, World Bank, Working Paper, no. 2131.
  32. Mboutchouang, V., J. Kenneck, and K. Mbenga. 2013. Intergenerational transmission of self-employed status and informal production units performance in Cameroon, MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
  33. Mincer, J. 1974. Schooling, Experience and Earnings, New York, Columbia University Press.
  34. Moreno, J. 2007. Los salarios del sector formal e informal en México: análisis de ganancias y pérdidas por formalización, Ensayos Revista de Economía, 31(1): 57-86.
  35. Packard, T. 2007. Do workers in Chile choose informal employment? A dynamic analysis of sector choice, World Bank, Working Paper, no. 4232.
  36. Pasquier-Doumer, L. 2012. Intergenerational transmission of self-employed status in the informal sector: A constrained choice or better income prospects? Evidence from seven West African Countries, Journal of African Economies, 22(1): 73-111.
  37. Perry, G.,W. Maloney, O. Arias, P. Fajnzylber, A.Mason, and J. Saavedra. 2007. Informality: Exit and exclusion, Latin American and Caribbean Studies, no. 40008, Washington, DC., World Bank.
  38. Rauch, J. 1991. Modeling the informal sector formality, Journal of Development Economics, 35(1): 33-47.
  39. Rees, H., and A. Shan.1986. An empirical analysis of self-employment in the U.K., Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1(1): 95-108.
  40. Torche, F. 2013. How do we characteristically measure and analyze intergenerational mobility? Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality (unpublished).
  41. Valero, J., and A. Tijerina. 2003. Transmisión intergeneracional del ingreso, empresariado y educación en México, Ensayos Revista de Economía, 22(2):19-34.