38-vol. 19, núm. 2, julio-diciembre, 2004
Artículos

México: evolución de la desigualdad de ingresos y las tasas de rendimiento de la educación (1988-2002)

pdf

PDF (English)
  • Gladys López Acevedo
Gladys López Acevedo
Banco Mundial
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24201/ee.v19i2.172

Publicado 2004-07-01

Palabras clave

  • desigualdad,
  • América Latina,
  • Latinoamérica,
  • ingresos

Cómo citar

López Acevedo, G. (2004). México: evolución de la desigualdad de ingresos y las tasas de rendimiento de la educación (1988-2002). Estudios Económicos De El Colegio De México, 19(2), 211–284. https://doi.org/10.24201/ee.v19i2.172

Métrica

Resumen

Este documento analiza los factores y mecanismos que han afectado la evolución de la desigualdad en México, se demuestra que la desigualdad educativa explica la mayor parte de la variación en la desigualdad de ingresos. La contribución de la desigualdad educativa a la desigualdad de ingresos en México es la segunda más alta en Latinoamérica. El incremento en la desigualdad de ingresos no parece ser el resultado de un deterioro en la distribución de la educación, a pesar de que el perfil de ingreso, el cual está relacionado con la tasa de retornos a la educación se ha vuelto más pronunciado.

 

pdf

PDF (English)

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

  1. Abadie, A. (1997). “Changes in Spanish Labor Income Structure During the 1980´s: A Quantile Regression Approach”, Investigaciones Económicas, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 253-272.
  2. Altimir, O and S. Piñera (1982). “Análisis de descomposición de las desigualdades de ingreso en la América Latina”, El Trimestre Económico, vol. 49, no. 196, pp. 813-860.
  3. Barros, R. and J. Almeida (1991). “Wage Inequality and the Distribution of Education: A Study of the Evolution of Regional Differences in Inequality in Metropolitan Brazil”, Journal of Development Economics, vol. 36, pp. 117-143.
  4. Bouillon Buendía, C., A. Legovini, and N. Lusting (1999) “Can Education Explain Income Inequality Changes in Mexico”, http://www.iadb.org/sds/doc/1488eng.pdf.
  5. Bouillon Buendía, C., A. Legovini, and N. Lusting (1999). “Rising Inequality in Mexico: Returns to Household Characteristics and the Chiapas effects”, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=182178.
  6. Bourguignon, F. (1979). “Decomposable Income Inequality Measures”, Econometrica, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 901-920.
  7. Bourguignon, F., M. Fournier, and M. Gurgand (1998). “Labor Incomes and Labor Supply in the Course of Taiwan´s Development, 1979-1994”, World Bank (mimeo).
  8. Buchinsky, M. (1998). “Recent Advances in Quantile Regression Models: A Practical Guideline for Empirical Research”. Journal of Human Resources, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 88-126.
  9. Buchinsky, M. (1995). “Quantile Regression, Box-Cox Transformation Model and the US Wage Structure, 1963-1987”, Journal of Econometrics, vol 65, pp. 109-154.
  10. Buchinsky, M. (1998). “Changes in the US Wage Structure 1963-1987: Application of Quantile Regression”, Econometrica, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 405-458.
  11. Burfisher, M. et al. (1993). Wage Changes in a US-Mexico Free Trade Area: Migration Versus Stolper-Samuelson Effects, WP 645, UC, Berkeley.
  12. Cowell, F. (1980). “On the Structure of Additive Inequality Measures”, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 47, pp. 521-531.
  13. Cragg, M., and M. Epelbaum (1996). “Why Has the Wage Dispersion Grown in Mexico? Is it the incidence of Reforms or the Growing Demand for Skills?”, Journal of Development Economics, vol. 51, no. 47, pp. 99-116.
  14. De Ferranti, D. et al. (2004). Inequality in Latin America: Breaking with History?, World Bank.
  15. De Ferranti, D. et al. (2003). Closing the Gap in Education and Technology, World Bank.
  16. De la Torre, R. (1997). Desigualdad, pobreza y polarización social en México (mimeo).
  17. Elías, J. (1992). Sources of Growth: A Study of Seven Latin American Economics, International Centre for Economic Growth, (mimeo).
  18. Feenstra, R. and H. Hanson (1996). “Globalization, Outsourcing, and Wage Inequality”, AEA Papers and Proceedings, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 240-245.
  19. Fields, G. (1996). Accounting for Income Inequality and Its Change, Cornell University, (mimeo).
  20. Fiszbein, A. (1991). An Essay on Labor Markets and Income Inequality in Less Developed Countries, Ph.D., UC, Berkeley.
  21. Hanson, H. (1997). “Increasing Returns, Trade, and the Regional Structure of Wages”, Economic Journal, vol. 107, no. 440, pp. 113-133.
  22. Hanson, H. and A. Harrison (1995). Trade, Technology, and Wage Inequality, WPS 5110, NBER, Cambridge.
  23. Hernández-Laos, E., N. Garro, and I. Llamas (1997). Productividad y mercado de trabajo en México, (mimeo).
  24. INEGI. Encuesta nacional de ingreso y gasto de los hogares (ENIGH), CD roms, several years, México.
  25. INEGI, Encuesta nacional del empleo urbano (ENEU), CD roms, severeal years, México.
  26. INEGI. Encuesta nacional de empleo trimestral (ENET), several years, México.
  27. Inter-American Development Bank (1998-1999). Informe: América Latina frente a la desigualdad: progreso económico y social en América Latina.
  28. Johnson, G. (1997). “Changes in Earnings Inequality: The Role of Demand Shifts”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 41-54.
  29. Juhn C., K. Murphy, and B. Pierce (1993). “Wage Inequality and the Rise in Returns to Skill”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 410-448.
  30. Knight, J. and R. Sabot (1983). “Educational Expansion and the Kuznets Effect”, American Economic Review, vol. 73, pp. 1132-1136.
  31. Leibbrandt, M., C. Woolard, and I. Woolard (1996). The Contribution of Income Components to Income Inequality in South Africa, WP 125, World Bank.
  32. Londoño, J. (1996). Poverty, Inequality, and Human Capital Development in Latin America, 1950-2025, World Bank (mimeo).
  33. López-Acevedo, G. and M. Walton (2004). Mexico Poverty Assessment, World Bank.
  34. Lustig, N. and M. Székely (1996). México: evolución económica, pobreza y desigualdad, (mimeo).
  35. Meza, L. (1999), “Cambios en la estructura salarial en México en el periodo 1988-1993 y el aumento en el rendimiento de la educación superior”, El Trimestre Económico, vol. 49, no. 196, pp. 813-860.
  36. Montenegro. C. (1999). “The structure of Wages in Chile 1960-1996: Am Approach of Quantile Regressions”, Economics Letters, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 229-235.
  37. Moreno, A. (1989), “La distribución del ingreso laboral urbano en Colombia: 1976-1988”, Desarrollo y Sociedad, vol. 24.
  38. Muller R. (1998). “Public-Private Sector Wage Differentials in Canada: Evidence from Quantile Regressions”, Economics Letters, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 229-235.
  39. Pánuco-Laguette, H. and M. Székely (1996). “Income Distribution and Poverty in Mexico”, in V. Bulmer-Thomas (ed.), The New Economic Model in Latin America and Its Impact on Income Distribution and Poverty, NY, St. Martin´s Press, pp. 185-222.
  40. Psacharopoulos, G. (1993). Returns to Investment in Education: A Global Update, Policy Research Paper 1067, World Bank.
  41. Psacharopoulos, G., et al. (1992). Poverty and Income Distribution in Latin America: The Story of the 1980s, World Bank (mimeo).
  42. Ramos, L. and C. Trindade (1992). “Educação e desigualdade de salários no Brasil: 1977-1989”, Perspectivas da Economía Brasileira, IPEA.
  43. Ramos, L. (1990). The Distribution of Earnings in Brazil: 1976-1985, Ph. D. diss., U. of California, Berkeley.
  44. Reis, J. and R. Paes de Barros (1989). Um estudo da evolução das diferenças regionais da desigualdade no Brasil, RJ, IPEA, (mimeo).
  45. Reyes, A. (1988). “Evolución de la distribución del ingreso en Colombia”, Desarrollo y Sociedad, vol. 21.
  46. Rodríguez, J. (1991). Desigualdad salarial y educación en Lima metropolitana: 1970 a 1984, Master´s thesis, PUC/RJ.
  47. Schultz,T. (1988), “Education Investments and Retunrs”, in H. Chenery and T. Srinivasan (eds.), Handbook of Development Economics, vol. 1, Elsevier, pp. 543-629.
  48. Shorrocks, A. (1984). “Inequality Decomposition by Factor Components”, Econometrica, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1369-1384.
  49. Shorrocks, A. (1980). “The Class of Additively Decomposable Inequality Measures”, Econometrica, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 613-625.
  50. Shorrocks, A., and J. Foster (1985). “Transfer Sensitive Inequality Measures”, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 5, pp. 105-138.
  51. Shorrocks, A., and D. Mookherjee (1982). “A Decomposition Analysis of the Trend in UK Income Inequality”, Economic Journal, vol. 92, pp. 886-902.
  52. Shultz P. and E. Mwabu (1996). “Symposium Issue on How International Exchange, Technology, and Institutions Affect Workers”, The World Bank Economic Review, vol. 11, no. 1.
  53. Syrquin, M. (ed.) (1997). A Symposium Issue on How International Exchange, Technology, and Institutions Affect Workers, The World Bank Economic Review, vol. 11, no. 1, special issue.
  54. Székely, M. (1995). “Aspectos de la desigualdad en México”, El Trimestre Económico, vol. 62, no. 246, pp. 201-243.
  55. Tan, H., and G. Batra (2000). “Technology and Firm Size-Wage Differentials in Colombia, Mexico, and Taiwan (China)”, The World Bank Economic Review, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 59-83.
  56. Vieira, M (1998). A relação entre educação e desigualdade no Brasil, Master´s diss, EPGE, RJ.
  57. World Bank (1996). World Development Report 1996, Washington, Oxford University Press.