Regional effect of energy reform in Mexico: A model of regional computable general equilibrium
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24201/ee.v35i1.398Keywords:
compact computable general equilibrium, social accounting matrix, education, skilled labor, human capitalAbstract
This paper presents a compact, dynamic computable general equilibrium model for the state of Tabasco, Mexico, calibrated to a social accounting matrix for 2003. Two simulations are presented: la reforma studies the impact of the recent energy reform in Mexico with more income from the petroleum production retained and invested in the educational sector. A second simulation, aguas profundas, invests in advanced petroleum technology. La reforma results in greater production, employment, equality and less poverty while aguas profundas generates more skilled employment and attracts more resources, national and international, to the region.
Metrics
References
Adelman, I. y S. Robinson. 1978. Income Distribution Policy in Developing Countries. A Case of Korea, Londres: Oxford University Press, publicado por el Banco Mundial; recuperado de http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/788551468773416261/Income-distribution-policy-in-developing-countries-a-case-study-of-Korea.
Albornoz-Mendoza, L. y A.J. Mainar-Causapé. 2019. Analysis of the social and environmental economic sustainability in the territory of Yucatan (Mexico), Papers in Regional Science, 98(2): 1215-1238, https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12390.
Arechavala, R. y C.F. Sánchez. 2017. Mexican public universities: The challenges of institutional transformation towards research and knowledge transfer, Revista de la Educación Superior, 46(184): 21-37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resu.2017.09.001.
Armenta, A. 2012. Análisis multisectorial de las políticas de desarrollo en Tabasco: un modelo de equilibrio general aplicado, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, tesis de doctorado.
Armenta, A., D. Flaherty, B. Gibson y J. Salazar-Carrillo. 2014. La reforma energética mexicana y sus efectos regionales: un modelo computable y compacto para Tabasco, Economics Research Occasional Paper Series, núm. 9, recuperado de http://economics.fiu.edu/research/occasional-papers-1/2014/20141024/20141024.pdf.
Baldwin, R. 2016. The Great Convergence: Information Technology and the New Globalization, Belknap Press.
Bulte, E.H., R. Damania y R.T. Deacon. 2004. Resource abundance, poverty and development, FAO-ESA Working Papers 0403.
Conacyt. 2015. Fortalecimiento en las entidades federativas de las capacidades científicas, tecnológicas y de innovación, México.
Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social. 2016. Coneval informa la evolución de la pobreza 2010-2016, recuperado de https://www.coneval.org.mx/SalaPrensa.
Contractor, F.J. y S.M. Mudambi. 2008. The influence of human capital investment on the exports of services and goods: An analysis of the top 25 services outsourcing countries, Management International Review, 48(4): 433-445, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-008-0025-9.
Dávila, A., J. Chapa y E. Ayala. 2015. Análisis comparativo de las estructuras productivas de las mesoregiones de México: la difícil adaptación al cambio en la política comercial, en A. Dávila (comp.), Modelos interregionales de insumo producto de la economía mexicana, México, Miguel Ángel Porrúa, pp. 231-274.
Dávila, A. y M. Valdés. 2016. Mexico: Economic performance of local economies 2003-2013, ECORFAN Journal-Mexico, 7(16): 1-22.
Dervis, K., J. De Melo y S. Robinson. 1989. General Equilibrium Models for Development Policy, A World Bank research publication, Washington, DC: The World Bank, https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/386191468765592396/General-equilibrium-models-for-development-policy.
Deaton, A. 2013. The Great Escape Health, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
Decaluwé, B. y A. Martens. 1988. CGE modeling and developing economies: A concise empirical survey of 73 applications to 26 countries, Journal of Policy Modeling, 10(4): 529-568.
Deverajan, S., D.S. Go, J.D. Lewis, S. Robinson y P. Sinko. 1997. Simple general equilibrium modeling, en J.F. Francois y K.A. Reinert (comps.), Applied Methods for Trade Policy Analisis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 156-186, https://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTAFROFFCHIECO/Resources/Simple_General_Equilibrium_Modeling.pdf.
Deverajan, S. y S. Robinson. 2013. Contribution of computable general equilibrium modeling to policy formulation in developing countries, en P. Dixon y D. Jorgenson (comps.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, 1a. edición, vol. 1, pp. 277-301, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59568-3.00005-5.
Elizondo, A. y R. Boyd. 2017. Economic impact of ethanol promotion in Mexico: A general equilibrium analysis, Energy Policy, vol. 101(C), pp. 293-301, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.017.
Elizondo, A., M. Abarrarán y R. Boyd. 2018. General equilibrium models: A computable general equilibrium model to analyze the effects of an extended drought on economic sectors in Mexico, en S. Quiroga (comp.), Economic Tools and Methods for the Analysis of Global Change Impacts on Agriculture and Food Security, Springer, pp. 119-129, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99462-87.
Garcés Díaz, D.G. 2008. Análisis de las funciones de importación y exportación de México (1980-2000), El Trimestre Económico, 75(1): 109-141.
Gibson, B. y D. van Seventer. 2000. Real wages, employment and macroeconomic policy in a structuralist model for South Africa, Journal of Africa Economies, 9(4): 512-546, https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/9.4.512.
Goldin, C. y F.L. Katz. 2009. The Race between Education and Technology: The Evolution of U.S. Educational Wage Differentials, 1890 to 2005, Harvard University Press y NBER.
González, E. y H. Sobarzo. 1999. Jalisco y la economía nacional: un modelo de equilibrio general computable, Momento Económico, 104: 35-51.
Ibarrarán, M.E., R. Boyd y A. Elizondo. 2015. Mexico: Reducing energy subsidies and analyzing alternative compensation mechanisms, Sobre México. Temas de Economía, 1(1): 26-45.
INEGI. 2013. Producto Interno Bruto (cuentas nacionales), recuperado de https://www.inegi.org.mx/est/contenidos/proyectos/cn/pibe/tabulados.aspx.
INEGI. 2016. Sistema de Cuentas Nacionales de México cifras preliminares: p1/A partir de 2014 cifras revisadas: r1/ A partir de 2013, recuperado de https://www.inegi.org.mx/.
International Trade Agreements. 2019. Free Trade Agreements, recuperado de https://www.trade.gov/fta/.
Jorgenson, D.W. 1984. Econometric methods for applied general equilibrium analysis, en H. Scarf y J. Shoven (comps.) Applied General Equilibrium Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139-203.
Jorgenson, D.W., H. Jin, D. Slesnick y P. Wilcoxen. 2013. An econometric approach to general equilibrium modeling, en P. Dixon y D.W. Jorgenson (comps.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, vol. 1, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1133-1212.
Jorgenson, D.W. y K. Yun. 2013. Taxation, efficiency and economic growth, en P. Dixon y D.W. Jorgenson (comps.) Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, vol. 1, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 659-741.
Kena, G.; W. Hussar; J. McFarland; C. de Brey; L. Musu-Gillette; X. Wang; J. Zhang; A. Rathbun; S. Wilkinson-Flicker; M. Diliberti; A. Barmer; F. Bullock Mann; E. Dunlop Velez. 2016. The Condition of Education 2016, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education,
Lofgren, H., R. Lee y S. Robinson. 2002. A Standard Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model in GAMS, Washington: The International Food Policy Research Institute.
Mitra-Kahn, B.H. 2008. Debunking the myths of computable general equilibrium models, The New School for Social Research,Working Paper Series, recuperado de https://www.economicpolicyresearch.org/images/docs/research/economicgrowth/SCEPA%20Working%20Paper%202008-1Kahn.pdf.
Núñez, G. 2016. Efectos económicos de políticas sociales y energéticas en México. Dos estudios de caso con una matriz de contabilidad social y un modelo de equilibrio general aplicado, México: El Colegio de México.
OCDE. 2017. Estudios Económicos de la OCDE, MÉXICO, Enero 2017, México.
OECD. 2018. Proportion of 15-29 year-old women not in employment, education or training (NEET), by age group, 2000-2017, OECD.Stat, recuperado de https://www.oecd.org/education/education-at-a-glance/.
Pedauga, L.E., F. Saez y A. Velázquez. 2012. Simulación de un modelo de equilibrio general computable para Venezuela, El Trimestre Económico, 79(2): 415-448.
Piña, J.M. 2015. Plan de desarrollo a largo plazo 2028, Colección Justo Sierra, México: Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco.
PLED. 2013. Plan estatal de desarrollo 2013-2018, Gobierno del Estado, Villahermosa, Tabasco.
Romalis, J. 2007. NAFTA’s and CUSFTA’s impact on international trade, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3): 416-435.
Sánchez, R. 2018. Diagnóstico del ecosistema de innovación y sustentabilidad en Quintana Roo, México, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health/Universidad Partenon de Cozumel.
Santos, E. y J. Chapa. 2013. Modelo de equilibrio general computable para Nuevo León: análisis del programa de apoyo directo al adulto mayor, Revista de Economía, XXX(81): 89-128.
Schmidt, S. y V. Wieland. 2013. The new Keynesian aproach to dynamic general equilibrium modeling: Models, methods and macroeconomic policy evaluation, en P. Dixon y D.W. Jorgenson (comps.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling 1A, Elsevier, pp. 1439-1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59568-3.00022-5.
Segal, P. 2011. El petróleo es nuestro: The distribution of oil revenues in Mexico, working paper, James Baker III, Institute for Public Policy, Rice University.
Sobarzo, H., L. Ruiz y M. Garcia. 2009. Hacia una caracterización de las determinantes del gasto estatal en México, en C. Chapa y C. Velázquez (comps.) Estudios del Ramo 33, El Colegio de México/Coneval, pp. 65-91.
Sour, L. y F. Girón. 2007. El efecto flypaper de las transferencias intergubernamentales del ramo 28 en los gobiernos locales mexicanos, 1990-2004, CIDE, DT, núm. 200.
Taylor, L. 1990. Socially Relevant Policy Analysis: Structuralist Computable General Equilibrium Models for the Developing World, The MIT Press.
UNDP. 1990. Human Development Report, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
UniRank. 2019. Top Universities in Mexico 2019 Mexican University Ranking, recuperado de https://www.4icu.org/mx/.
Winchester, N. 2008. Trade and Rising Wage Inequality: What Can We Learn from a Decade of Computable Equilibrium Analysis? en D. Greenway, R. Upward y P.Wright (comps.), Globalisation and Labour Market Adjustment, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 57-72.
Wood, D. 2018. La nueva reforma energética de México, Washington: Wilson Center, Mexico Institute.
World Bank. 2013. Goverment expenditure on education (% of GDP) 2013, recuperado de https://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/.
World Bank. 2018a. Goverment expenditure on education (% of GDP) 2018, recuperado de http://hdr.undp.org/en/indicators.
World Bank. 2018b. New country classifications by income level 2018, recuperado (3-V-2019) de https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/.
World Bank. 2018c. Mexico: Country Program Evaluation: An Evaluation of the World Bank Group’s Support to Mexico (2008-17), Independent Evaluation Group. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Language
Search
Social Networks
Newsletter
Statistics
View 
Biblat Indicators 
Matomo
