Patterns of spatial co-location of the aerospace industry in Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24201/ee.v31i1.15Keywords:
co-location, aerospace industry, agglomerationsAbstract
Mexico’s aerospace industry (IA) is considered strategic due to the possibilities offered to national business to be inserted into supply chain; by its productive characteristics involves the development of suppliers by externalities, which requires business co-location. This document applies the Co-location Quotient (CLQ) statistic in five Mexican entities in order to detect spatial co-location patterns in clusters related to the IA. The results indicate its spatial attraction to aerospace business, as well as electronics, machinery and equipment. Additionally, it can be identified differences in regards colocation patters with respect to the productive capacities by entity; this suggests inputs for the design of industrial policy.
Downloads
References
Báez, E., P. Zambrano y J. Villalobos. 2010. El centro de investigación e innovación en ingeniería aeronáutica y su relación con la industria del norte de México, .
Batheld, H., A. Malmberg y P. Maskell. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation, Progress in Human Geography, 28(1): 31-56.
Bédier, C., M. Vancauwenberghe y V. W. Sintern. 2008. The growing role of emerging markets in aerospace, McKinsey & Company.
Blair, J. 1995. Local economic development: Analysis and practice, Londres, Sage.
Blalock, G. y P. Gertler. 2008. Welfare gains from foreign direct investment through technology transfer to local suppliers, Journal of International Economics, 74(2): 402-421.
Bunyaratavej, K., E. Hahn y J. Doh. 2008. Multinational investment and host country development: Location efficiencies for services offshoring, Journal of World Business, 43(2): 227-242.
Carrillo, J. y A. Hualde. 2013. ¿Una maquiladora diferente? Competencias laborales profesionales en la industria aeroespacial en Baja California, en M. Casalet (comp.), La industria aeroespacial: complejidad productiva e institucional, México, FLACSO, pp. 163-197.
Casalet, M. 2013. Actores y redes públicas y privadas en el desarrollo del sector aeroespacial internacional y nacional: el clúster de Querétaro, una oportunidad regional, en M. Casalet (comp.), La industria aeroespacial: complejidad productiva e institucional, México, FLACSO, pp. 93-134.
Casalet, M., E. Buenrostro, F. Stezano, R. Oliver y L. Abelenda. 2011. Evolución y complejidad en el desarrollo de encadenamientos productivos en México. Los desafíos de la construcción del cluster aeroespacial en Querétaro, Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
Chu, B., H. Zhang y F. Jin. 2010. Identification and comparison of aircraft industry clusters in China and United States, Chinese Geographical Science, 20(5): 471-480, Doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0421-5.
Cliff, A. D. y J. K. Ord. 1981. Spatial processes: Models and application, Londres, Pion.
Contreras, O. y A. Bracamonte. 2013. Capacidades de manufactura global en regiones emergentes. La industria aeroespacial en Sonora, en M. Casalet (comp.), La industria aeroespacial: Complejidad productiva e institucional, México, FLACSO, pp. 199-223.
Cooke, P. 2002. Biotechnology clusters as regional, sectorial innovation systems, International Regional Science Review, 25(1): 8-37.
Cressie, N. A. C. 1991. Statistics for spatial data, Nueva York, Wiley.
Cromley, R. G., D. M. Hanink y G. C. Bentley. 2013. Geographically weighted colocation quotients: Specification and applications, The Professional Geographer, 20(10): 37-41, Doi: 10.1080/00330124.2013.768130.
Dyer, J. 1996. Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry, Strategic Management Journal, 17: 271-292.
D&B. 2011. Aerospace: Regulatory & policy benchmarking, << www.dsir. gov.in/reports/isr1/Aerospace/8 7.pdf >>.
Federación Mexicana de la Industria Aeroespacial (FEMIA). 2012. Pro-Aéreo 2012 2020, programa estratégico de la industria aeroespacial, << http://economia.gob.mx/files/comunidad negocios/industria comercio/PROAEREO-12-03-2012.pdf >>.
Esposito, E. y R. Passaro. 1997. Material requirement planning and the supply chain at Alenia aircraft, European Journal of Puchasing and Supply Management, 3(1): 43-51.
Feldman, M. 2003. The locational dynamics of the U.S. biotechnology industry: Knowledge externalities and the anchor hypothesis, Industry and Innovation, 10(3): 311-328.
Flores, M. y A. Villarreal. 2014. Exploración de la geografía de la innovación en México por medio del análisis de datos espaciales, El Trimestre Económico, 81(2): 517-544.
Fujita, M. 2007. Towards the new economic geography in the brain power society, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37: 482-490, doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2007.04.004
Fujita, M. y P. Krugman. 1995. When is the economy monocentric? Von Thünen and Chamberlin unified, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25: 505-528.
Giunipero, L. 1990. Motivating and monitoring Jit supplier performance, Journal of Purchasing and Material Management, 26(3): 19-25.
Goffin, K., F. Lemke y M. Szwejczewski. 2006. An exploratory study of ‘close’ supplier-manufacturer relationships, Journal of Operations Management, 24: 189-209.
Hahn, C., C. Watts y K. Kim. 1990. Supplier development program: A conceptual model, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 26(2): 2-7.
Harris, C. 1954. The market as a factor in the localization of production, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 44: 315-348.
Hartley, J. y T. Choi. 1996. Supplier development: Customers as a catalyst of process change, Business Horizons, 39(4): 37-44.
Humphrey, J. y H. Schmitz. 2000. Governance and upgrading: Linking industrial cluster and global value chain research, IDS Working Paper, núm. 120.
Humphrey, J. y H. Schmitz. 2002. Developing country firms in the global economy: Governance and upgrading in global value chains, Duisburg: INEF-Report 61.
ICF SH&E. 2012. Aerospace globalization 2.0: Implications for Canadian suppliers, Industry Conference and 17th Annual General Meeting-Toronto, OAC.
Jiménez, A. 2013. México, fábrica de aviones, suplementos corporativos, M.M.G., Communications, Inc.< www.aviaciononline.com/2010/02 /08/mexicofabrica-de-aviones/>.
Keesing, D. y S. Lall. 1992. Marketing manufactured exports from developing countries: Learning sequences and public support, en G. Helleiner (comp.), Trade policy, industrialization and development, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 176-193.
KPMG. 2014. Competitive alternatives, KPMD’s guide to international business location costs.
Krause, D. 1997. Supplier development: Current practices and outcomes, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 33(2): 12-19.
Krause, D. 1999. The antecedents of buying firms’ efforts to improve suppliers, Journal of Operations Management, 17(2): 205-224.
Krugman, P. 1980. Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade, American Economic Review, 70: 950-959.
Krugman, P. 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography, Journal of Political Economy, 99: 483-499.
Krugman, P. y R. Livas. 1996. Trade policy and the third world metropolis, Journal of Development Economics, 49: 137-150.
Krugman, P. y A. Venables. 1995. Globalization and the inequality of nations, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110: 857-880.
Leslie, T. F., C. L. Frankenfeld y M. A. Makara. 2012. The spatial food environment of the DC metropolitan area: Clustering, co-location, and categorical differentiation, Applied Geography, 35: 300-307, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.07.008
Leslie, T. F. y B. Kronenfeld. 2011. The colocation quotient: A new measure of spatial association between categorical subsets of points, Geographical Analysis, 43: 306-326.
Li, S., B. Ragu-Nathan, T. Ragu-Nathan y S. Rao. 2006. The impact of supply chain management on competitive advantage and organizational performance, Omega, 34:107-124.
Mayer, A. 2014. Supply chain metrics that matter: A focus on aerospace & defense. Using financial data from corporate annual reports to better understand the aerospace & defense industry, Supply Chain Insights, LLC.
Martinez, J. 2011. The development of aerospace clusters in Mexico, tesis de doctorado, Université du Quebecá Montreal.
Marshall, A. 1920. Principles of economics, Macmillan, Londres, 8th. Edition.
Monczka, R., J. Trent y T. Callahan. 1993. Supply base strategies to maximize supplier performance, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistic Management, 23(4): 42-54.
Morán, C. A. y A. Mayo. 2013. La ingeniería en la industria aeroespacial. Estado del arte y prospectiva de la ingeniería en México y el mundo, Academia de Ingeniería de México y Conacyt.
Niosi, J. y M. Zhegu. 2005. Aerospace clusters: Local or global knowledge spillovers? Industry and Innovation, 12(1): 1-25. doi: 10.1080/1366271042000339049.
ÓhUallacháin, B. y T. F. Leslie. 2013. Spatial pattern and order in sunbelt retailing: Shopping in Phoenix in the 21st Century, The Professional Geographer, 65(3): 396-420.
Padilla-Pérez, R. 2008. A regional approach to study technology transfer through foreign direct investment: The electronics industry in two Mexican regions, Research Policy, 37: 849-860, doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.003
Piore, M. y C. Ruiz Duran. 1998. Industrial development as a learning process: Mexican manufacturing and the opening to trade, en M. Kagami, J. Humphrey y M. Piore (comps.) Learning, liberalization and economic ad- justment, Tokyo, Institute of Developing Economies, pp. 191-241.
Pred, A. 1966. The spatial dynamics of US urban industrial growth, Cambridge, MIT Press.
ProMéxico. 2012a. Plan de vuelo. Industria aeroespacial de México, Mapa de ruta. Plan Nacional .
ProMéxico. 2012b. Plan de vuelo. Industria aeroespacial de México, Mapa de ruta. Baja California, .
ProMéxico. 2012c. Plan de vuelo. Industria aeroespacial de México, Mapa de Ruta. Chihuahua, .
ProMéxico. 2013a. Matrix of capabilities, products and processes, .
ProMéxico. 2013b. Plan nacional de vuelo. Industria aeroespacial mexicana, Mapa de ruta, .
ProMéxico. 2014. Matrix of capabilities, products and processes, .
Schmitz, H. y P. Knorringa. 2000. Learning from global buyers, Journal of Development Studies, 37(2): 177-205.
Secretaría de Economía (SE). 2012. Industria aeronáutica en México, .
Stimson, R., R. Stough y B. Roberts. 2006. Regional economic development: Analysis and planning strategy, Berlin, Springer.
UNCTAD. 2011. Foreign direct investment, the transfer and diffusion of technology, and sustainable development, United Nations, Genova.
Vallejos, R. 2008. Assessing the association between two spatial or temporal sequences, Journal of Applied Statistics, 35: 1323-1343.
Venables, A. 1996. Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries, International Economic Review, 37(2): 341-359.
Vickery, S., J. Jayaram, C. Droge y R. Calantone. 2003. The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: An analysis of direct versus indirect relationships, Journal of Operations Management, 21(5): 523-539.
Villarreal, A. y M. Flores. 2015. Identificación de clusters espaciales y su especialización económica en el sector de innovación, Región y Sociedad, 27(62): 117-147.
Villavicencio, D., J. Hernández y L. Souza. 2013. Capacidades y oportunidades para el desarrollo de la industria aeronáutica en Querétaro, en M. Casalet (comp.). La industria aeroespacial: complejidad productiva e institucional, México, FLACSO, pp. 49-91.
Williamson, O. 1979. Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations, Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2): 233-261.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract1679
-
PDF (Español)459
-
XML (Español)3
Language
Search
Social Networks
Newsletter
Statistics
View 
Biblat Indicators 
Matomo
