Number of children in Uruguayan households: An analysis of economic determinants, 1996-2006

  • Verónica Amarante Universidad de la República
  • Ivone Perazzo Universidad de la República
Keywords: childrens, households, microeconomic determinants, count data models, Uruguay
JEL Classification: J13, D10

Abstract

This article analyzes the evolution of the number of children in Uruguayan households during the last decade. With that purpose, differences in the number of children per household and in fertility, by socioeconomic strata, are considered in the period 1996-2006. We then estimate different econometric specifications trying to capture the effect of diverse socioeconomic factors on household decisions regarding the number of children. Education, specifically women’s education results as the most important factor for these decisions.

References

Becker, G. 1960. A treatise on the family, Harvard University Press.

Becker, G. y H. Lewis. 1973. On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children, The Journal of Political Economy, 81: S279-S288.

Brass, W. 1974. Métodos para estimar la fecundidad y la mortalidad en poblaciones con datos limitados, Centro Latinoamericano y Caribeño de Demografía, Santiago de Chile.

Cameron, A. y P. K. Trivedi. 1986. Econometric models based on count data: Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1(1): 29-53.

Chackiel, J. y S. Scholnick. 1998. América Latina: la transición demográfica en los países rezagados, Centro Latinoamericano y Caribeño de Demografía, serie B, núm. 124 (LC/DEM/R.286).

Chen, Z. y F. Woolley. 1993. A Cournot-Nash model of family decision making, The Economic Journal, 111(474): 722-748.

Chiappori, P. 1992. Collective Labor Supply and Welfare, Journal of Political Economy, 100(3): 43767.

Cochrane S. 1983. Effects of education and urbanization on fertility, en R. A. Bulatao y R. Lee (comps.), Determinants of fertility in developing countries, vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, 587-626.

Ferreira F. y P. Leite. 2002. Educational expansion and income distribution. A micro-simulation for Ceará, Departamento de Economía, PUC-RIO, texto para discussao, núm. 456.

Folbre, N. 1986. Cleaning house: New perspectives on huseholds and economic development, Journal of Development Economics, 22(1): 5-40.

Fortin, B. y G. Lacroix. 1997. A test of the unitary and collective models of household labour supply, Economic Journal, 107(443): 933955.

Greene, W. 2000. Econometric analysis, Prentice Hall, NY.

Hoddinott, J. y H. Haddad. 1995. Does female income share ifluence household expenditures? Evidence from Cote de Ivoire, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 57(1): 77-96.

Klasen, S. y S. Woltermann. 2005. The impact of demographic dynamics on economic development, poverty and inequality in Mozambique, University of Goettingen, Discussion Paper Series, núm.126.

Klawon, E. y J. Tiefenthaler. 2001. Bargaining over family size: the determinants of fertility in Brazil, Population Research and Policy Review, 20: 423-440.

Lundberg S. y R. Pollak. 1993. Separate sphere bargaining and the marriage market, Journal of Political Economy 101(6): 988-1010.

Marchionni M. y L. Gasparini. 2007. Tracing out the effects of demographic changes on the income distribution. Greater Buenos Aires 1980-1998, Journal of Economic Inequality, 5: 97-114.

McElroy M. y M. Horney. 1981. Nash-Bargained household decisions: Toward a generalization of the theory of demand, International Economic Review, 22(2): 333-349.

Melkersson M. y D. Rooth. 2000. Modeling female fertility using inflated count data models, Journal of Population Economics, 13(2): 189-203.

Mincer, J. 1963. Market prices, opportunity costs and income effects, en C. Christ (comp.), Measurement in economics, Stanford University Press, 36-52.

Naciones Unidas. 1983. Manual X. Indirect Techniques for Demographic Estimation (ST/ESA/SER.A/81), Nueva York.

Nguyen-Dinh, H. 1997. A socioeconomic analysis of the determinants of fertility: the case of Vietnam, Journal of Population Economics, 10(3): 251-271.

Paredes, M. y C. Varela. 2005.Aproximación sociodemográfica al comportamiento reproductivo y familiar en el Uruguay, Programa de Población, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República, DT núm. 67.

Ray, D. 1998. Development economics, Princeton University Press.

Rubinstein, A. 1982. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model, Econometrica, 50: 97110.

Schkolnik, S. 2004. La fecundidad en América Latina: transición o revolución?, CEPAL, Serie Seminarios y Conferencias, núm. 36 (LC/L. 2097-P).

Schultz, T. 1990. Testing the neoclassical model of family labor supply and fertility, Journal of Human Resources, 25(4): 599634.

Schultz, T. 2001. The fertility transition: economic explanations, Economic Growth Center, Yale University, Center Discussion Paper, núm. 833

Thomas, D. 1990. Intra-household resource allocation: an inferential approach, Journal of Human Resources, 25(4): 635-664.

Varela, C. 1999. La fecundidad adolescente: una expresión de cambio del comportamiento reproductivo en el Uruguay, Salud Problema, 4(6): 51-64.

Varela, C., R. Pollero y A. Fostik. 2008. La fecundidad: evolución y diferenciales en el comportamiento reproductivo, en C. Varela (comp.) Demografía de una sociedad en transición, capítulo 2, Programa de Población y UNFPA.

Veloso, F. 1999. Wealth composition, endogenous fertility and the dynamics of income inequality. University of Chicago (inédito).

Wang W. y F. Famoye. 1997. Modeling household fertility decisions with generalized Poisson regression, Journal of Population Economics, 10: 273-283.

Winkelmann, R. y K. Zimmermann. 1995. Recent developments in count data modelling: theory and application, Journal of Economic Surveys, 9(1): 1-24.

Published
01-01-2011
How to Cite
AmaranteV., & PerazzoI. (2011). Number of children in Uruguayan households: An analysis of economic determinants, 1996-2006. Estudios Económicos, 26(1), 3-34. https://doi.org/10.24201/ee.v26i1.106
  • Abstract viewed - 407 times
  • PDF (Spanish) downloaded: 179 times